first attack and then denied. The last shot of Berlusconi did not bat an eyelid, is in his style. Blackmail on Sunday launched the reforms, the draft White yes, but only if you tow the reform tv. The diktat has the "merit" to reassemble the Union. After screaming for 17 months that the government would collapse to be denied each time, now seems to emerge the new tactics of the former leader of the defunct House of Freedoms. Openness to dialogue with the center on the electoral law, but no net change in the reform of the TV and on conflict of interest. In connection with telephone Roccaraso, the Knight comes to say: "We could not deal with political forces to implement a decision as criminal design Gentiloni. There would be no possibility of dialogue - Berlusconi said - with those who act in this way. "
Then, twenty-four hours later denies this: "The electoral law has nothing to do with the Gentiloni, and I certainly have not been to link the two issues' but insists that is impossible to work with" a government that is stained such wickedness, inconcepibile in una vera democrazia». La Gentiloni, appunto.
Così, in pratica, all'ex premier andrebbe benissimo il “porcellum” di Calderoli, quello attualmente in vigore e definito tale dallo stesso esponente leghista, con qualche piccolo ritocco. L’obiettivo resta comunque il modello francese. «Sono d'accordo con Veltroni, ha dato buoni risultati. Per fare in Italia quello che Sarkozy ha fatto in Francia in poco tempo ci vorrebbero 2-3 anni. Ci vuole un solo turno, una sola scheda, un solo voto. Speriamo che si trovi l'accordo», ha detto ancora il Berlusconi.
Il dietrofront fa comunque tirare un sospiro di sollievo: se «le affermazioni di ieri - aveva detto Veltroni - non sono accettabili», Piò now return "to seek a solution." "It's all back where we were - he said - I think that there are all conditions to make progress." I also appreciate the PRC secretary Franco Giordano believes that "a good thing that Berlusconi has denied the exchange between electoral law reform and television." And once again make clear the position of his party: "Make no mistake - he said - I want to clarify that we are absolutely unwilling to endorse any suggestion of exchange because of conflicting interests and reform must be part of a television culture that has yet to be fully deployed in our country. "
Sunday fired the leader of the Party dle Freedom of sparked the unanimous reaction of the majority. And in particular by the Minister of Communications, Paolo Gentiloni. The microphone at the TG3, Gentiloni stresses that the law on radio and television system "go ahead", "should bring more diversity into a system that the previous legislature has been very limited." "Of course - adds Gentiloni - has to keep the agreement on the electoral law and it is good that the two remain distinct plans. If you mix if you plan to trade under the table errors are very serious. " It also rears
Pietro Folena, the PRC, which is the rapporteur of the bill Gentiloni. "I'm sorry and I am surprised that when we dialogue on electoral law for the good of the country and the consolidation of the political system, Prime Minister Berlusconi makes everything to put in the attic of the bill Gentiloni, namely the guarantee for his personal and business interests. A statesman - pursues the leader of the PRC - which is the one for the public interest, especially in a phase of institutional reform, is able to put aside their own particular. Mix two different and distinct issues such as the electoral law and reform of the TV is absolutely contrary to the spirit of dialogue needed in these circumstances. When examining the bill Gentiloni - Folena ends - we are open to dialogue with the opposition, Berlusconi knows this. Now showing responsibility di fronte al Paese e alle istituzioni».
L’Unione si riunirà in un vertice lunedì alle 18, in attesa del confronto di martedì in commissione Affari Costituzionali al Senato sulla bozza Bianco. Nel frattempo, mercoledì la Camera di consiglio dei 14 giudici della Corte Costituzionale avvierà il procedimento per decidere sull'ammissibilità del referendum, che diventerà strada obbligata se dovesse saltare l’intesa in Parlamento.
0 comments:
Post a Comment